Forenzička neuropsihologija - uloga i značaj u pravosudnom sistemu

Autori

  • Ivana Leposavić Klinički centar Srbije, Klinika za psihijatriju, Beograd, Srbija
  • Jasna Veljković Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, Srbija

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2101053L

Ključne reči:

forenzička neuropsihologija; simulacija; agravacija; testiranje napora; neuropsihološka evaluacija

Apstrakt

Područje forenzičke neuropsihologije je novo i počiva na obimnoj istraživačkoj bazi. Njegovom razvoju svakako doprinosi i proširivanje područja neuropsihologije na dečju, adolescentnu i neuropsihologiju starenja. Razlika između neuropsihološke prakse u kliničkim uslovima i one u forenzičkoj oblasti je upečatljiva. Ciljevi u ove dve specijalnosti se značajno razlikuju i ta ključna razlika u ciljevima vodi do različitih pretpostavki, uloga, saveza i metoda. Etički i zakonski zahtevi ograničavaju obelodanjivanje određenih podataka do kojih je došao forenzički neuropsiholog, kao što je testovni materijal i testovni rezultati. Zahtev za obezbeđivanje kopija ovih podataka može biti upućen samo od strane drugog neuropsihologa koji je angažovan kao savetnik od strane suda, tužilaštva ili odbrane. Neuropsihološko testiranje u velikoj meri zavisi od uloženog napora ispitanika, jer je jedan od ciljeva otkriti gornju granicu kognitivnih sposobnosti. Neuropsiholozi rutinski procenjuju neadekvatan testovni napor i preuveličavanje simptoma i problema. Takođe, važno je objasniti ispitanicima značaj ulaganja maksimalnog napora u radu kao i preciznog izveštavanja o sopstvenim simptomima i problemima.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Reference

American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.

American Psychological Association. 2017. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Washington, D.C.

Boone, K. B. 2007. Assessment of Feigned Cognitive Impairment: A Neuropsychological Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

Boyd, A. R., A. M. McLearen, R. G. Meyer, and R. L. Denney. 2006. Detection of Deception. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Bush, S. S., R. M. Ruff, A. I. Troster, J. T. Barth, S. P. Koffler, and N. H. Pliskin. 2005. "Symptom Validity Assessment: Practice Issues and Medical Necessity." Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

Denney, R. L., and T. F. Wynkoop. 2000. "Clinical Neuropsychology in the Criminal Forensic Setting." Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200004000-00005

Faust, D. 1991. "Forensic Neuropsychology: The Art of Practicing a Science That Does Not Yet Exist." Neuropsychology Review 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109045

Greenberg, S. A., and D. W. Shuman. 1997. "Irreconcilable Conflict Between Therapeutic and Forensic Roles." Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 28. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.28.1.50

Hannary, H. J., and M. D. Lezak. 2004. "The Neuropsychological Examination: Interpretation." In Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th ed., edited by M. D. Lezak, D. B. Howieson, and D. W. Loring. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heilbrun, K., G. R. Marczuk, D. DeMatteo, E. A. Zillmer, J. Harris, and T. Jennings. 2003. "Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment: Implications for Neuropsychological Assessment in Forensic Contexts." Assessment 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103258591

Hom, J. 2003. "Forensic Neuropsychology: Are We There Yet?" Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(03)00076-3

Hom, J., and J. Nici. 2004. "Forensic Neuropsychology." In Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Intellectual and Neuropsychological Assessment, Vol. 1, edited by G. Goldstein and S. R. Beers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471726753.ch22

Horton, A. M. N. 2003. "Overview of Forensic Neuropsychology." In Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology, edited by A. M. N. Horton and L. C. Hartlage. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Kodeks etike psihologa Srbije. 2000. Beograd: Društvo psihologa Srbije.

Larrabee, G. J. 2005. Forensic Neuropsychology: A Scientific Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Larrabee, G. J. 2007. "Introduction: Malingering, Research Designs, and Base Rates." In Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits, edited by G. J. Larrabee. New York: Oxford University Press.

Martell, D. A. 1992. "Forensic Neuropsychology and the Criminal Law." Law and Human Behavior 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044772

Martelli, M. F., S. S. Bush, and M. D. Zasler. 2003. "Identifying, Avoiding, and Addressing Ethical Misconduct in Neuropsychological Medicolegal Practice." International Journal of Forensic Psychology 1(1).

Resnick, P. J. 1997. "Malingering of Posttraumatic Disorders." In Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception, 2nd ed., edited by R. Rogers. New York: Guilford Press.

Rogers, R. 2008. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press.

Saks, M. J. 1990. "Expert Witnesses, Nonexpert Witnesses, and Nonwitness Experts." Law and Human Behavior 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068158

Serafim, A., F. Saffi, T. Silva, C. Almeida, E. Hokama, and D. Barros. 2015. "Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment: A Review of Its Scope." Archives of Clinical Psychiatry 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000049

Sullivan, J. P., and R. L. Denney. 2003. "Constitutional and Judicial Foundations in Criminal Forensic Neuropsychology." Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v03n04_03

Wynkoop, T. F., and R. L. Denney. 1999. "Exaggeration of Neuropsychological Deficit in Competency to Stand Trial." Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v01n02_04

Downloads

Objavljeno

10.07.2021

Kako citirati

Leposavić, Ivana, и Jasna Veljković. 2021. „Forenzička Neuropsihologija - Uloga I značaj U Pravosudnom Sistemu “. Crimen 12 (1):53-64. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2101053L.

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Pregledni članci