Pretpostavka nevinosti u pravu EU

Korak napred, dva koraka nazad

Autori

  • Svetlana Nenadić Tužilaštvo za ratne zločine, Beograd

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2101038N

Ključne reči:

pretpostavka nevinosti; Povelja o osnovnim pravima EU; Direktiva o pretpostavci nevinosti; sudska praksa Suda pravde EU; sudska praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava

Apstrakt

Tema rada je pretpostavka nevinosti u pravu EU i praksi Suda pravde EU. Rad započinje prikazom pravne regulacije pretpostavke nevinosti u Povelji o osnovnim pravima EU i Direktivi na jačanju određenih aspekata pretpostavke nevinosti i prava okrivljenog da prisustvuje suđenju. U drugom delu rada analizirana je sudska praksa Suda pravde EU u primeni Direktive o pretpostavci nevinosti sa posebnim osvrtom na standarde Evropskog suda za ljudska prava uspostavljene u primeni pretpostavke nevinosti kao ljudskog prava. Rad ukazuje na minimalističku orijentaciju Suda pravde EU u primeni pretpostavke nevinosti, koji u pojedinim elementima spušta standarde zaštite ovog ljudskog prava ispod nivoa zaštite koji nudi Evropski sud za ljudska prava. Uspostavljanje niskih standarda u zaštiti pretpostavke nevinosti na nivou EU preti da proizvede domino efekat na krivične sudove država članica EU što bi moglo da stvori rizik po pretpostavku nevinosti kao garant legitimiteta krivičnog postupka.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Reference

Amatrudo, A., and Blake, L. W. 2015. Human Rights and the Criminal Justice System. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797228

Ashworth, A. 1999. Principles of Criminal Law. 3rd ed. Oxford.

Bovend’Eerdt, K. 2016. "The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?" Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 32(83). https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.337

Dawson, M. 2013. "The Political Face of Judicial Activism: Europe’s Law Politics Imbalance." In Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, edited by M. Dawson, B. De Witte, and E. Muir. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939395.00007

Duff, A. 2013. "Pre-Trial Detention and the Presumption of Innocence." In Prevention and the Limits of Criminal Law, edited by A. Ashworth, L. Zedner, and P. Tomlin. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656769.003.0007

Gain, M. S. 1989. "The Bail Reform Act of 1984 and United States v. Salerno: Too Easy to Believe." Case Western Reserve Law Review, no. 139.

Lazin, Đ. 1981. "Sadržina i pravna priroda pretpostavke nevinosti." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 5–6.

Lopez, V. 2017. "The Presumption of Innocence in Directive 2016/343/EU of 9 March 2016." ERA Forum, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0480-5

Martufi, A., and Peristeridou, C. 2019. "Pilate Washing His Hands: The CJEU on Pre-Trial Detention." Criminal Law and Criminology. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/blog/2019/12/pilate-washing-his-hands-cjeu-pre-trial-detention.

Matić Bosković, M. 2020. "Uređenje Procesnih Prava Osumnjičenih i Okrivljenih u Pravnim Tekovinama Evropske Unije." Strani pravni život 64(1).

Matić Bosković, M., and Kostić, J. 2020. "Application of the Ne Bis in Idem Related to Financial Offences in the Jurisprudence of the European Courts." NBP: Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-27224

Ristivojević, B. 2009. "Upotreba Metoda Tumačenja u Krivičnom Pravu." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, no. 2.

Schroeder, W. 2020. "Limits to European Harmonization of Criminal Law." EUCRIM, iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-008

Sliedregt, E. 2009. "A Contemporary Reflection on the Presumption of Innocence." Revue internationale de droit penal 80(1–2). https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.801.0247

Terpan, F., and Saurugger, S. 2019. "Assessing Judicial Activism of the CJEU: The Case of the Court’s Defence Procurement Rulings." Journal of European Integration 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1537268

Wahl, T. 2019. "CJEU: EU Directive Does Not Cover Procedure for Reviewing the Lawfulness of Pre-Trial Detention." EUCRIM. https://eucrim.eu/news/cjeu-eu-directive-does-not-cover-procedure-reviewing-lawfulness-pre-trial-detention/.

Downloads

Objavljeno

10.07.2021

Kako citirati

Nenadić, Svetlana. 2021. „Pretpostavka Nevinosti U Pravu EU: Korak Napred, Dva Koraka Nazad “. Crimen 12 (1):38-52. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2101038N.

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Članci