The presumption of innocence in EU law
One step forward, two steps backwards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2101038NKeywords:
presumption of innocence; Charter of fundamental rights of the EU; the Directive on presumption of innocence; case law CJEU; case law ECtHRAbstract
The topic of the paper is the presumption of innocence in EU law and the case law of the Court of Justice EU. The paper begins by outlining legal regulation of the presumption of innocence in the Charter of fundamental rights of the EU and the Directive on certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings. The second part of the paper analyzes the case law of the Court of Justice EU in the application of the Directive with special reference to the presumption of innocence standards of the European Court of Human Rights. The paper points out the minimalistic orientation of the CJEU regarding the presumption of innocence, which in some elements lowers the standards of protection offered by ECtHR. Low standards threaten to produce a domino effect on the criminal courts in EU member states, which could create a risk to the presumption of innocence as a guarantee of the legitimacy of criminal proceedings.
Downloads
References
Amatrudo, A., and Blake, L. W. 2015. Human Rights and the Criminal Justice System. New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797228
Ashworth, A. 1999. Principles of Criminal Law. 3rd ed. Oxford.
Bovend’Eerdt, K. 2016. "The Joined Cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: A New Limit to the Mutual Trust Presumption in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice?" Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 32(83). https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.337
Dawson, M. 2013. "The Political Face of Judicial Activism: Europe’s Law Politics Imbalance." In Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, edited by M. Dawson, B. De Witte, and E. Muir. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939395.00007
Duff, A. 2013. "Pre-Trial Detention and the Presumption of Innocence." In Prevention and the Limits of Criminal Law, edited by A. Ashworth, L. Zedner, and P. Tomlin. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656769.003.0007
Gain, M. S. 1989. "The Bail Reform Act of 1984 and United States v. Salerno: Too Easy to Believe." Case Western Reserve Law Review, no. 139.
Lazin, Đ. 1981. "Sadržina i pravna priroda pretpostavke nevinosti." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 5–6.
Lopez, V. 2017. "The Presumption of Innocence in Directive 2016/343/EU of 9 March 2016." ERA Forum, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0480-5
Martufi, A., and Peristeridou, C. 2019. "Pilate Washing His Hands: The CJEU on Pre-Trial Detention." Criminal Law and Criminology. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/blog/2019/12/pilate-washing-his-hands-cjeu-pre-trial-detention.
Matić Bosković, M. 2020. "Uređenje Procesnih Prava Osumnjičenih i Okrivljenih u Pravnim Tekovinama Evropske Unije." Strani pravni život 64(1).
Matić Bosković, M., and Kostić, J. 2020. "Application of the Ne Bis in Idem Related to Financial Offences in the Jurisprudence of the European Courts." NBP: Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo25-27224
Ristivojević, B. 2009. "Upotreba Metoda Tumačenja u Krivičnom Pravu." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, no. 2.
Schroeder, W. 2020. "Limits to European Harmonization of Criminal Law." EUCRIM, iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-008
Sliedregt, E. 2009. "A Contemporary Reflection on the Presumption of Innocence." Revue internationale de droit penal 80(1–2). https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.801.0247
Terpan, F., and Saurugger, S. 2019. "Assessing Judicial Activism of the CJEU: The Case of the Court’s Defence Procurement Rulings." Journal of European Integration 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1537268
Wahl, T. 2019. "CJEU: EU Directive Does Not Cover Procedure for Reviewing the Lawfulness of Pre-Trial Detention." EUCRIM. https://eucrim.eu/news/cjeu-eu-directive-does-not-cover-procedure-reviewing-lawfulness-pre-trial-detention/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Svetlana Nenadić
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, allowing others to share the work with proper attribution to the authors and acknowledgment of its original publication in this journal.
