Oduzimanje imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela
Evropski okvir i srpsko zakonodavstvo
Ključne reči:
prošireno oduzimanje; pretpostavka nevinosti; teret dokazivanjaApstrakt
Donošenjem Zakona o oduzimanju imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela 2008. godine, u srpsko krivično pravo uvedeno je tzv. prošireno oduzimanje imovinske koristi pribavljene krivičnim delom. Ovo oduzimanje primenjuje se u pogledu onih plodova kriminalne aktivnosti kod kojih nije moguće neposredno dokazati da su pribavljeni krivičnim delom, ali gde postoji očigledna nesrazmera imovine okrivljenog i njegovih zakonitih prihoda. Prošireno oduzimanje postoji u različitim formama u evropskom zakonodavstvu. Od naročitog je značaja Direktiva o zamrzavanju i oduzimanju imovinske koristi pribavljene krivičnim delima u Evropskoj uniji. Međutim, i pored unošenja proširenog oduzimanja u mnoga evropska zakonodavstva, ono je istovremeno praćeno brojnim prigovorima. Autor razmatra najznačajnije prigovore koji se upućuje proširenom oduzimanju u srpskoj i uporednoj literaturi, ukazujući da će i pored brojnih kritika kriminalno-politička potreba nalagati da ovaj institut zadrži svoje mesto u savremenom zakonodavstvu.
Downloads
Reference
Alagna, F. 2014. "Non-conviction Based Confiscation: Why the EU Directive is a Missed Opportunity." European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-014-9252-8
Atanacković, D. 1959. "Burden of Proof in Criminal Procedure." Pravni život 9–10.
Bajović, V. 2015. On Facts and Truth in Criminal Procedure. Belgrade.
Begović, B. 2015. Economic Analysis of General Prevention. Belgrade.
Beljanski, S. 2014. In Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code, edited by G. Ilić et al., 7th ed. Belgrade.
Boucht, J. 2013. "Extended Confiscation and the Proposed Directive on Freezing and Confiscation of Criminal Proceeds in the EU: On Striking a Balance between Efficiency, Fairness and Legal Certainty." European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-21022024
Bowles, R., M. Faure, and N. Garoupa. 2000. "Economic Analysis of the Removal of Illegal Gains." International Review of Law and Economics 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(00)00049-1
Davidson Gray, A. 2012. "Forfeiture Provisions and the Criminal/Civil Divide." New Criminal Law Review 1. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2012.15.1.32
Dickson, D. J. 2009. "Towards More Effective Asset Recovery in Member States—the UK Example." ERA Forum 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-009-0122-7
Eser, A. 2001. In Strafgesetzbuch. Kommentar, edited by A. Schönke and H. Schröder, 26th ed. Munich.
Fraschini, G., and C. Putaturo. 2013. Illicit Assets Recovery in Italy. Transparency International Italia.
Fuchs, H., and A. Tipold. 2012. In Wiener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, edited by F. Höpfel and E. Ratz, Vienna.
Gradowski, M., and J. Ziegler. 1997. "Money Laundering, Asset Forfeiture: Initial Experiences with New Legal Regulations." Wiesbaden.
Grubač, M., and T. Vasiljević. 2014. Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code, 13th ed. Belgrade.
Heckmann, D. 1995. "The Confiscation of Suspected Assets: Regulation of the 'Burden of Proof Reversal' in the Draft Law on Asset Confiscation." Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1.
Herzog, F. 2005. In Strafgesetzbuch. Band 1, edited by U. Kindhäuser, U. Neumann, and H.-U. Paeffgen, 2nd ed. Baden-Baden.
Ilić, G. P., et al. 2009. Commentary on the Law on Confiscation of Property Derived from Criminal Offenses. Belgrade.
Ilić, G. P. 2011. "Confiscation of Property Derived from Criminal Offenses." In Criminal Legislation and Crime Prevention, Brčko.
Jayawickrama, N., J. Pope, and O. Stolpe. 2002. "Legal Provisions to Facilitate the Gathering of Evidence in Corruption Cases: Easing the Burden of Proof." Forum on Crime and Society 1.
Jescheck, H.-H., and T. Weigend. 1996. Lehrbuch des Strafrechts. Allgemeiner Teil. 5th ed. Berlin.
Joecks, W. 2005. In Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch. Band 2/1, edited by B. von Heintschel-Heinegg, Munich.
Julius, K.-P. 1997. "Confiscation, Forfeiture, and Article 14 GG." Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 1.
King, C. 2012. "Using Civil Process in Pursuit of Criminal Law Objectives: A Case-Study of Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture." International Journal of Evidence & Proof 4. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2012.16.4.411
Köhler, M., and W. Beck. 1991. "Fair Monetary Penalties Instead of Confiscatory Asset Sanctions." Juristenzeitung 17.
Lazin, Đ. 1985. In Dubio Pro Reo in Criminal Procedure. Belgrade.
Lukić, N. 2014. Combating Organized Crime: A Comparative Approach. Belgrade.
Majić, M. 2010. "Confiscation of Property Derived from Criminal Offenses." In The State of Crime in Serbia and Legal Measures of Response, Part IV, Belgrade.
McCaw, C. E. 2011. "Asset Forfeiture as a Form of Punishment: A Case for Integrating Asset Forfeiture into Criminal Sentencing." American Journal of Criminal Law 2.
Meade, J. 2000. "The Disguise of Civility: Civil Forfeiture of the Proceeds of Crime and the Presumption of Innocence in Irish Law." Hibernian Law Journal 1.
Oduzimanje imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela. Evropski sud za ljudska prava. Odabrane presude i odluke. 2013. Belgrade.
Rui, J. P. 2012. "Non-conviction Based Confiscation in the European Union: An Assessment of Art. 5 of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Freezing and Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime in the European Union." ERA Forum 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-012-0269-5
Simić, I., and A. Trešnjev. 2005. Collection of Court Decisions in Criminal Law. Vol. 6. Belgrade.
Simić, I., and A. Trešnjev. 2006. Collection of Court Decisions in Criminal Law. Vol. 7. Belgrade.
Simić, I., and A. Trešnjev. 2008. Collection of Court Decisions in Criminal Law. Vol. 8. Belgrade.
Stojanović, Z. 2015. Criminal Law: General Part, 22nd ed. Belgrade.
Škulić, M. 2015. Organized Crime: Concept, Forms, Criminal Offenses, and Criminal Procedure. Belgrade.
Važić, N. 2011. "Dilemmas in the Practical Application of the Law on Confiscation of Property Derived from Criminal Offenses." Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Cassation 2.
Vettori, B. 2006. Tough on Criminal Wealth: Exploring the Practice of Proceeds from Crime Confiscation in the EU. Dordrecht.
Downloads
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2016 Igor Vuković
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i daju časopisu pravo prvog publikovanja rada, što omogućava drugima da dele rad uz priznanje autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
