Ultima ratio in the light of criminal offence Construction without a building permit (Art. 219a CC)

Authors

  • Jovana Banović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1901069B

Keywords:

construction; building permit; ultima ratio (last resort); crimes; restitution claim

Abstract

In this Article, the author explained one of the basic principles of Criminal law - their ultima ratio character as a part of the legitimacy policy. The last resort has been presented as an important method in the law-making process, as well as in its application. Thus, both the parliament and judicial authorities should start from the main purpose of Criminal law, avoiding extensive usage of punitive mechanisms in general and not allowing the prevalling influence of "punitive populism". These theoretical postulates are presented as a fundament for the analysis of the criminal offence Construction without a building permit which is prescribed by the article 219a of the Criminal Code of Serbia. The author showed some imperfections of positive provision such as "the attack on lex certa" as a part of legal principle through the shortcomings of the legislative technical regulation; potential misunderstanding of the "building permit" meaning; restitution claim non-use, despite it can bring some economic benefits. Also, it was emphasized that the same conduct from the Art. 219a CC is (at the most) prescribed by secondary law (Planning and Construction Law) as a commercial offence, which can have proceeding impact onne bis in idem principle. The protected object is vague because "the property" is a little bit far away of administrative procedure which is substantially contained in the following provisions. Also, we point to praxis which is created by public authorities.The potential problem with this incrimination can be non efficiency influence on those to whom is addressed. In the future, the legislator may think about decriminalization of this offence through transforming it in commercial offence or misdemeanor. If it is a "big step" from the sociopolitical aspect, the space for improving current norm will be still opened in a legislative technical way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashworth, A., and J. Horder. 2013. Principles of Criminal Law (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 2, "Criminalization." https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199672684.003.0002

Bajović, V. 2016. "Slučaj Milenković – Ne bis in idem u krivičnom i prekršajnom postupku." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji VI deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović.

Begović, B. 2010. "Ekonomska teorija generalne prevencije: osnovna pitanja." Crimen, no. 1.

Cohen, M. R. 1940. "Moral Aspects of the Criminal Law." The Yale Law Journal 49 (6). https://doi.org/10.2307/792227

Delić, N. 2014. Nova rešenja u posebnom delu Krivičnog zakonika Srbije. Beograd.

Delić, N. 2015. "Criminalisation versus Decriminalisation – The Status and Perspectives of the Special Part of the Serbian Criminal Legislation." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji V deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović.

Feinberg, J. 1986. Harm to Self – The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195046641.001.0001

Husak, D. 2005. "Applying Ultima Ratio: A Skeptical Assessment." Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2:535.

Husak, D. 2008. Overcriminalization – The Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328714.001.0001

Ignjatović, Đ. 2017. "Kazneni populizam." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji VII deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović.

Ilić, G. P. 2017. "Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava." Strani pravni život, God. 61, Br. 3. https://doi.org/10.56461/spz17302I

Jareborg, N. 2005. "Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima ratio)." Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2:521.

Kokolj, M., and M. Marković. 2009. Privredno prestupno pravo. Novi Sad.

Kuhn, A., and M. Solcà. 2018. "Recourt-on de manière excessive au système pénal en Suisse?" Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique 71 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688398.025

Lasslett, K. 2017. "Uncovering the Crimes of Urbanisation – Researching Corruption, Violence and Urban Conflict – Summary and Contents." https://www.routledge.com/Uncovering-the-Crimes-of-Urbanisation-Researching-Corruption-Violence/Lasslett/p/book/9781138120327 (accessed January 13, 2019). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651798

Perović, S., and D. Stojanović, eds. 1980. Komentar zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Kragujevac-Novi Sad.

Radbruch, G. L. 1936. "Jurisprudence in the Criminal Law." Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 18 (4).

Rodriguez, R. C. 2014. "Derecho Penal como ultima ratio. Hacia una politica criminal racional." Revista Ius et Praxis 14 (1): 12.

Schonsheck, J. 1994. On Criminalization – An Essay in the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8100-4

Stojanović, Z. 2013. "Da li je Srbiji potrebna reforma krivičnog zakonodavstva?" Crimen, no. 2.

Stojanović, Z. 2016a. Krivično pravo – opšti deo. Beograd.

Stojanović, Z. 2016b. Politika suzbijanja kriminaliteta. Beograd.

Stojanović, Z. 2016c. "Garantivna funkcija krivičnog prava." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji VI deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović.

Stojanović, Z. 2018. Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2017. "Pravna priroda i krivičnopravni (materijalni i procesni) efekat zastarelosti krivičnog gonjenja II deo." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 1.

Vuković, I. 2015. "O opravdanosti tzv. svojeručnih krivičnih dela." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji V deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović.

Downloads

Published

04.07.2019

How to Cite

Banović, Jovana. 2019. “Ultima Ratio in the Light of Criminal Offence Construction Without a Building Permit (Art. 219a CC) ”. Crimen 10 (1):69-86. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1901069B.

Issue

Section

Articles