The concept of detention in practice of courts

Authors

  • Gordana Krstić The Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime in the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade

Keywords:

detention; deprivation of liberty; detainee; alternative measures; immunity

Abstract

The detention is very important measure to secure the presence of the defendant and for untroubled conduct of criminal proseedings. It is also the most difficult mechanism which can be undertaken against a defendant for whom there exists grounded suspicion that has committed a criminal offence and also special reasons for ordering detention, which are proscribed by Criminal Procedure Code. They are referring to risk of escaping, circumstances indicating that he will destroy or conceal the evidences or obstruct the trial by exerting influence on witnesses and other suspects, risk of repeating the criminal offence and finally when the criminal offence with which he is charged is punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than ten years or more than five years for a criminal offence with elements of violence, or he has been sentenced by a court of first instance to a term of imprisonment of five years or more, and the way of committing or the seriousness of consequences of the criminal offence have disturbed the public to such an extent that this may threaten the fair conduct of criminal proceedings. While ordering the detention is the way of deprivation of liberty, this mattery is also regulated by Constitutional Act. Regarding to the emforcement of the detention in practice of courts in the Republic of Serbia, there are a lot of different cases and in every particular case the reasons for ordering or extending the detention have to be the object of examination of competent courts. They have to give relevant arguments for not revoking the detention. This arguments will not be sufficient if they are the same and stereotyped as in the previous rulings, and that includes the arbitrary deprivation of liberty and the violation of right to freedom and security. Bearing that in mind, it is the duty of all authorities which are participating in criminal proceedings, especially the Courts and the Public Prosecutor's Officies, to take care of the duration of detention as short as possible and to suggest the alternative measures that can substitute the detention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bejatović, S., M. Škulić, and G. Ilić. 2013. Priručnik za primenu Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd. https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv1305256B

Beljanski, S. 2001. Međunarodni pravni standardi o krivičnom postupku. Beograd.

Đorđević, Đ. 2015. "Preopterećenost zakonskih kapaciteta i moguća rešenja ovog problema." Strani pravni život.

Goati, V. 2007. Parlamentarizam i partijski sistem Srbije: Dileme i izazovi parlamentarizma. Beograd.

Ilić, G., M. Majić, S. Beljanski, and A. Trešnjev. 2012. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd.

Ivošević, Z. 2012. "Pravni položaj javnih funkcionera." Pravni zapisi. Beograd.

Kovačević, N., Ž. Marković, and N. Nikolić. 2014. Pritvor – ultima ratio? Beograd.

Macovei, M. 2002. The Right to Liberty and Security of the Person: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Handbooks, No. 5.

Marković, M. B. 2014. "Osnov odgovornosti za štetu zbog neosnovanog lišenja slobode i neosnove osude." PRAVO – teorija i praksa. Novi Sad.

Marković, R. 2005. Ustavno pravo i političke institucije. Beograd.

Marković, R. 2006. "Ustav Republike Srbije iz 2006 – kritički pogled." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. Beograd.

Milosavljević, B. 2012. "Načelo podele vlasti u Ustavu i ustavnoj praksi Republike Srbije." Pravni zapisi. Beograd.

Mitić, M., and S. Đorđević. 2007. Diplomatsko i konzularno pravo. Beograd.

Nenadić, B. 2009. "Ustavni sud Republike Srbije u svetlu Ustava iz 2006. godine." Revus – Revija za evropsku ustavnost. Kranj, Slovenia. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.1137

Orlović, S. P. 2013. "Ustavne reforme i položaj Vlade Srbije." Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo. Beograd.

Stojanović, Z. 2006. Međunarodno krivično pravo. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2015. Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2011. Maloletničko krivično pravo. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2013a. "Novi zakonik o krivičnom postupku – Očekivanja od primene." Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo.

Škulić, M. 2013b. Osnovne novine u krivičnom procesnom pravu Srbije – Novi Zakonik o krivičnom postupku iz 2011. godine. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2013c. "Odnos načela istine i pojednostavljenih formi krivičnog postupka." In Pojednostavljene forme postupanja u krivičnim stvarima: regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva i iskustva u primeni, edited by I. Jovanović and M. Stanisavljević.

Trešnjev, A. 2015. "Razlozi za pritvor u svetlu Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda." Strani pravni život.

Zlatarić, B., and M. Damaška. 1966. Rječnik krivičnog prava i postupka. Zagreb.

Downloads

Published

29.06.2018

How to Cite

Krstić, Gordana. 2018. “The Concept of Detention in Practice of Courts”. Crimen 9 (1):71-102. https://epub.ius.bg.ac.rs/index.php/crimenjournal/article/view/413.

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)