Is the new act on prevention of domestic violence manifestation of so called security law?
Keywords:
domestic violence; family; crime supression policy; feminist movement; victim; woman; criminal lawAbstract
The paper is devoted to a critical examination of the effects and scope of the new Act on Prevention of Domestic Violence. Placing it in the framework he refers to as the specialisation of criminal law in Serbia, the author undertakes to present criminal policy arguments against the underlying premise of the Act. By arguing the lack of justification for its introduction into the legal system, on the ground that it was not preceded by any extensive research into the state of this socio-pathological phenomenon, the author simultaneously identifies, by way of a brief genealogical analysis, the extreme dogma of the women's rights movement as both a source of value on which the Act rests, and a source of all of its adverse effects on the legal system in general. The value source from which the Act's solutions derive is one-sided, plain and prejudiced view of the relations between genders rather than care for the state of affairs in a family in the Serbian society. In fact, what this Act concerns itself with is overstating the human rights of women in relationships with men, where women are the alleged victims of gender-based violence, rather than preventing the adverse effects of aggressive tendencies on harmonious and balanced family relationships. The means by which it does so is extremely questionable and doubtful, as it introduces the categories of possible perpetrator of violence, who is in fact the future criminal offender, domestic violence risk assessment, which is a kind of prediction that someone will commit a criminal offence, responsibility that shifts back, which means before the criminal prosecution takes place or before anyone is even suspected, which thus represents some kind of criminal procedure for the offence yet to be committed in the future or, better yet, a future criminal procedure. On the whole, in drafting this Act, the lawmaker sailed into what would law consider uncharted waters - those that very few, even from the science fiction, ever ventured in, and even they with difficulty. Evidently, this venture is another embodiment in science of a legislative phenomenon described as the so-called security law. But, it would still, at least in Serbia, be its worst face. The one conceived to undermine the most important institution of any society - the family.
Downloads
References
Bačić, F. 1980. Krivično pravo – opći dio. Zagreb: Narodna knjiga.
Calisse, C. 2001. A History of Italian Law. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Dobash, R. E., and R. P. Dobash. 2004. "Woman's Violence to Man in Intimate Relationship: Working on a Puzzle." British Journal of Criminology, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/crimin/azh026
Dutton, D. G., and T. L. Nicholls. 2005. "The Gender Paradigm in Domestic Violence: Research and Theory." Aggression and Violent Behaviour, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.001
Ferri, E. 1920. "Nomination of a Commission for the Positivist Reform of the Italian Penal Code." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1133792
Ferri, E. 1921. "Reform of Penal Law in Italy." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/1133439
Frank, S. 1955. Teorija kaznenog prava. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod.
Fuko, M. 2005. Psihijatrijska moć: Predavanja na Kolež de Fransu 1973–1974. Novi Sad: Gradina.
Herbert, T. B., R. C. Herbert, and J. H. Ellard. 1991. "Coping With an Abusive Relationship: I. How and Why Do Women Stay?" Journal of Marriage and Family, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/352901
Ignjatović, Đ. 2008. Kriminologija. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik.
Jerotić, V. 2000. Čovek i njegov identitet. Belgrade: Prosveta.
Kidd, A. M. 1922. "Preliminary Project for an Italian Criminal Code." California Law Review, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3473611
Mišambled, R. 2015. Istorija nasilja od kraja srednjeg veka do danas. Novi Sad: Prometej.
Pagelow, M. D. 1984. Family Violence. New York: Praeger.
Stojanović, Z. 2013. Krivično pravo – opšti deo. Belgrade: Pravni fakultet.
Strube, M. J. 1988. "The Decision to Leave an Abusive Relationship: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Issues." Psychological Bulletin, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.104.2.236
Sokoloff, N. J., and I. Dupont. 2005. "Domestic Violence at the Intersection of Race, Class and Gender: Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence Against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities." Violence Against Women, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204271476
Schechter, S. 1982. Woman and Male Violence: The Vision and Struggles of the Battered Women’s Movement. Cambridge: South End Press.
Todd, A. J. 1924. "On the Reform of the Italian Penal Code." Journal of Criminology and Criminal Law, no. 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/1134266
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Branislav Ristivojević
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, allowing others to share the work with proper attribution to the authors and acknowledgment of its original publication in this journal.