The right to a reasoned order on determination of special evidentiary actions and (critical) review of the practice of the European court of human rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2102198PKeywords:
special evidentiary actions; illegal evidence; measures of secret surveillance; right to a fair trail; right to respect for private and family lifeAbstract
Increasingly dangerous, and internationally distributed, (organized) crime has caused the need for states to find adequate means to put an end to all this. Of course, today, as many years before, we can hear that criminals are "one step ahead of the state." That, when we look at the situation around us, is unfortunately not far from the truth. However, faced with this problem, states at the normative level, in order to anticipate criminal behavior, as well as, if the crime has already been committed, to reliably identify the perpetrators, stipulate (besides general evidentiary actions) special evidentiary actions/techniques in national legislation. That is quite legitimate. However, when the state prescribes certain rules, or conditions under which certain (evidentiary) actions must be taken, then it is more than unusual that state does not respect what it has prescribed. In the following lines, we were dealing with special evidentiary actions, predominantly the general characteristics of the same and in connection with them the practice of the ECtHR. All this with the aim of trying to present (from our point of view) a plausible practice, with the hope that we will break with the previous one, which in our opinion is not good.
Downloads
References
Arnold, R. S. 1987. "Caught in a Wiretap: The Ethical and Evidentiary Dangers of Using Illegally Obtained Evidence." Family Advocate 10, no. 1, Special Issue on Evidence.
Burke, C. K. 1981. "Secret Surveillance and the European Court of Human Rights." Stanford Law Review 33, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228433
Dajović, G., and B. Spaić. 2019. "Doktrina 'četvrte instance' i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 67, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D
Davies, L. G. 2002. "The Exclusion of Evidence Illegally or Improperly Obtained: An Unsatisfactory Answer to an Unstated Question." Journal of Financial Crime 9, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026023
Feješ, I. I. 2015. "Sistem izuzetaka od primene 'teorije ploda otrovnog drveta'." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 2.
Garačić, A. 2014. Zakon o kaznenom postupku: Pravni lijekovi. Rijeka.
Gluščić, S. 2012. "Posebne dokazne radnje." Policija i sigurnost 21, no. 3.
Grubač, M., and T. Vasiljević. 2014. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku: Prema Zakoniku iz 2011. godine, trinaesto izdanje. Beograd.
Grubač, M., and B. Vučković. 2010. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku Crne Gore, treće izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Tivat.
Ilić, P. G. 2011. "Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku." Crimen 2.
Ilić, P. G. 2015. "O nezakonitim dokazima u krivičnom postupku." In Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji – V deo, edited by Đ. Ignjatović, Beograd.
Ilić, P. G., M. Majić, S. Beljanski, and A. Trešnjev. 2015. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku: Prema stanju zakonodavstva od 7. maja 2015. godine, osmo izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.
Karas, Ž., and M. Jukić. 2009. "Promjene u sustavu nezakonitih dokaza, s osvrtom na kretanja u poredbenom pravu." Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 16, no. 2.
Kovačević, M. 2014. "Tajni nadzor komunikacije – usklađenost sa praksom Evropskog suda za ljudska prava." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 62, no. 2.
Krapac, D. 2000. Kazneno procesno pravo: Knjiga prva – Institucije. Zagreb.
McBride, J. 2009. Human Rights and Criminal Proceedings – The Case Law of European Court of Human Rights. First edition. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Meese, J. 2017. "The Use of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Criminal Cases: A Brief Overview." ERA Forum 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0471-6
Mole, N., and C. Harby. 2006. The Right to a Fair Trial: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights. Strasbourg.
Obradović, B., and I. Župan. 2011. "‘Plodovi otrovne voćke’ u hrvatskom i poredbenom pravu." Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 18, no. 1.
Paunović, N. 2019. "Simulovani poslovi kao posebna dokazna radnja u srpskom krivično-procesnom pravu – zakonsko rešenje i neka sporna pitanja." Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, LXVII, Elektronski dodatak – studentski radovi.
Plazinić, M., and M. Stojković. 2015. "Primena posebnih dokaznih radnji i mehanizmi njihove kontrole." In Tužilačka reč, edited by M. Plazinić, no. 28.
Skakavac, Z., and T. Skakavac. 2017. "Krivičnoprocesna regulacija posebnih dokaznih radnji u Republici Srbiji i njihova primena u savremenoj praksi." Civitas 7, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5937/Civitas1701036S
Stojanović, Z. 2014. Krivično pravo – Opšti deo. Beograd.
Stojanović, Z., and D. Kolarić. 2010. Krivičnopravno reagovanje na teške oblike kriminaliteta. Beograd.
Šikman, M. 2017. "Posebne istražne radnje i odluke Evropskog suda za ljudska prava." RKK 1.
Škulić, M. 2009. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Podgorica.
Škulić, M. 2012. Krivično procesno pravo, 5th edition. Beograd.
Škulić, M. 2015. "Tajni audio i video nadzor kao posebna dokazna radnja u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku Srbije." In Tužilačka reč, edited by M. Plazinić, no. 28.
Vasiljević, T. 1981. Sistem krivičnog procesnog prava SFRJ, treće izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.
Vitkauskas, D., and G. Dikov. 2017. Protecting the Right to a Fair Trial Under European Convention of Human Rights: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners, 2nd edition. Strasbourg.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Krsto Pejović, Nina Paović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, allowing others to share the work with proper attribution to the authors and acknowledgment of its original publication in this journal.