Conditional release: Disputable questions and modern normative solutions

Authors

Keywords:

conditional release; prison capacities; supervision; sentenced person

Abstract

Modern tendencies in penal policy, the wide use of imprisonment and the phenomenon of the longtime growth of prison population impose the need to reassess the purpose of conditional release, i.e. to show the new interpretation of the conditional release function. In spite of the rich and long-lasting experience of the practical use of different forms of conditional release, dilemmas are being maintained, both conceptual and normative, regarding the models of conditional release, the method of the decision-making and the body authorized to decide about conditional release, the relevant period of the served sentence, the conditions needed for conditional release, the validity of the supervision of the sentenced person on conditional release, as well as the forms of the necessary supervision, the content of the obligations and prohibitions that should possibly be posed to the sentenced person on conditional release. Similar dilemmas regarding this legal institute are following the practice of conditional release in the Republic of Serbia, despite more than 140 years of continuous use of conditional release. Especially emphasized current interest for the conditional release problems in domestic conditions is the consequence of the perennial overburdening of prison capacities as well as the new legal provisions about conditional release. The review of disputable questions and their interpretation in current conditions should contribute to the understanding of the existing dilemmas and finding the functional solutions for practical use of the relevant legal provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aebi, M. F., and N. Delgrande. 2011. SPACE I (2009): Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics. Strasbourg: PC-CP.

Austin, J., and T. Fabelo. 2004. The Diminishing Returns of Increased Incarceration: A Blueprint to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Costs. The JFA Institute, Washington, DC.

Clear, T. R., and G. F. Cole. 2003. American Corrections. Belmont.

Garland, D. 1996. “The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society.” British Journal of Criminology 36. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105

Garland, D. 2005. “The Meaning of Mass Imprisonment.” Punishment & Society 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221228.n1

Gidens, E. 2007. Sociologija. Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet.

Gulazzi, A., C. Mancuso, and A. Mangiaracina. 2012. “‘Back Door Sentencing’ in Italy: Common Reasons and Main Consequences for the Recall of Prisoners.” European Journal of Probation 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031200400107

Ignjatović, Đ. 2010. Kriminologija. Beograd.

Ilić, Z., and G. Jovanić. 2011. Zatvor i/ili sloboda pod nadzorom. Beograd.

Komentar Krivičnih zakona. 1981. Edited by N. Srzentić. Beograd.

Konstantinović-Vilić, S., and M. Kostić. 2011. Penologija. Niš.

Kupčević-Mlađenović, R. 1972. Osnovi penologije. Sarajevo.

Mays, G. Larry, and L. Thomas Winfree Jr. 2002. Contemporary Corrections. Stamford.

Livingston, S., and T. Owen. 1995. Prison Law: Text and Materials.

Maguire, M., and P. Raynor. 1997. “The Revival of Throughcare: Rhetoric and Reality in Automatic Conditional Release.” British Journal of Criminology 37 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014128

Milutinović, M. 1981. Penologija. Beograd.

Padfield, N., and Sh. Maruna. 2006. “The Revolving Door at the Prison Gate: Exploring the Dramatic Increase in Recalls to Prison.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806065534

Padfield, N. 2012. “Recalling Conditionally Released Prisoners in England and Wales.” European Journal of Probation 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031200400104

Pavlović, M. 2007. “Slabost krivične presude u Srbiji krajem XIX i početkom XX veka.” Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 55 (2).

Petersilia, J. 1999. “Parole and Prisoner Reentry in the United States.” Crime and Justice 26. https://doi.org/10.1086/449302

Robinson, G. 1999. “Risk Management and Rehabilitation in the Probation Service: Collision and Collusion.” The Howard Journal 38 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00145

Soković, S. 2011. “Nova penologija – karakteristike i perspektive.” Pravni život, knj. 547, br. 9.

Soković, S. 2011. “Savremene globalne tendencije u kontroli kriminaliteta (karakteristike, perspektive i osvrt na domaće prilike).” Crimen 2.

Soković, S. 2012a. “Penitencijarne statistike: mera kriminaliteta i/ili više od toga.” In Evidentiranje kriminaliteta: iskustvo iz sveta i Srbija, edited by Vesna Nikolić-Ristanović. Beograd.

Soković, S. 2012b. “Savremeni kazneni populizam: uzroci, odlike i posledice.” Pravna riječ 9 (33).

Stojanović, Z. 2013. Krivično pravo, opšti deo. Beograd.

Stojanović, Z., and D. Kolarić. 2012. “Nova rešenja u krivičnom zakoniku R. Srbije.” Bezbednost LIV (3).

The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society. 1995. Edited by N. Morris and D. J. Rotman. New York: Oxford.

Tournier, P. V. 2004. “Systems of Conditional Release (Parole) in the Member States of the Council of Europe, Between the Principle of Equality and Individualization, Pragmatism.” New French Journal of Criminology, Penal Field 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.378

Weaver, B., C. Tata, M. Munro, and M. Barry. 2012. “The Failure of Recall to Prison: Early Release, Front-Door and Back-Door Sentencing in the Revolving Prison Door in Scotland.” European Journal of Probation 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031200400108

Williams, K. S. 2008. Textbook on Criminology. Oxford.

Zimring, F. E. 2011. “Imprisonment Rates and the New Politics of Criminal Punishment.” Punishment & Society 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228159

Downloads

Published

12.05.2014

How to Cite

Soković, Snežana. 2014. “Conditional Release: Disputable Questions and Modern Normative Solutions”. Crimen 5 (1):35-49. https://epub.ius.bg.ac.rs/index.php/crimenjournal/article/view/521.

Issue

Section

Articles