The Threshold Figure: Agamben and Arendt on the (Im)Possibility of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_26106AKeywords:
phone, logos, bios, zoe, human rightsAbstract
This paper seeks to follow Giorgio Agamben’s critical project, which entails a renewed analysis of key concepts within Western philosophy and political thought. This undertaking enables Agamben to bring to light a certain logical regularity in the concatenation of concepts, and ultimately in the very mode of thinking that structures Western politics. Through an analysis of the concepts phone/logos and bios/zoe it will be shown that the political subject does not precede the political order but rather emerges through an operation of selection and identification with the privileged pole of difference. By calling into question the status of the subject as a potential bearer of rights, we simultaneously problematize the concept of the human as a figure produced through the work of the anthropological machine. In this sense, the fracture of the human as the central site of Western political functioning sheds light on the question of the universality of human rights. Their claim to belong to the human as such independent of political status, religious or national affiliation—proves to be merely superficial. It thus becomes necessary to expose the underlying mechanism through which the concatenation of these concepts forms a political order that, in turn, conditions the universality of human rights.
References
Agamben, Đorđo. 2018. Homo Sacer: Suverena moć i goli život. Beograd, Karpos
Lechte John, Saul Newman . 2012. Agamben, Ardent and human rights. European Journal of Social Theory
Schuilenburg, Marc, 2008. The Refugee as Homo Sacer A Short Introduction to Agamben's 'Beyond Human Rights. Open 2008,No.15, Social Engineering
Arent, Hana. 1998. Izvori totalitarizma .Beograd: Feministick izdavačka kuća
Agamben, Đorđo. 2014. Otvoreno: Čovjek i životinja. Beograd, Gradac
Attell, Kevin. 2005. The Exceptional Life of the State: Giorgio Agamben’s State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Ross, Alison. 2012. Agamben’s Political Paradigm of the Camp: Its Features and Reasons. 9600 Garsington Road,Oxford and Main Street, Malden, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Anckaert, Luc G. 2022. Agamben and the Biopolitical Understanding of the Shoah Problemos. Lituania, Vilniaus Universitetas.
Vatter, Miguel. 2008. In Odradek’s World Bare Life and Historical Materialism in Agamben and Benjamin. Diacritics
Ransijer, Žak. 2014, Nesaglasnosti. Beograd, Fedon
Delez, Žil. 2009. Razlika i Ponavljanje. Beograd, Fedon
Balunović Filip. 2023. Beda ljudskih prava. Beograd, Fakultet za medije i komunikacije
Janicka Iwona. 2020. Who can speak? Ranciere, Latour and the Question of Articulation. Basel, MDPI
Rancière Jacques. 2004, Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?, The South Atlantic Quarterly br.103. Aristotel, 1988. Politika, Zagreb, Globus