NE BIS IN IDEM IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE CASE MILENKOVIĆ V. SERBIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_21203AKeywords:
Ne Bis In Idem, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Milenković v Serbia, Protocol No. 7Abstract
In comparative and domestic case law, individuals are often being criminally prosecuted for actions that also contain elements of misdemeanours or other administrative or disciplinary offenses, for which they have already been trialed and even punished. This is evidentially a violation of the ne bis in idem principle, which represents not only one of the basic pillars of criminal law, but also internationally protected human right. Therefore, through analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, in particular Milenković v. Serbia case, together with the stands of domestic courts on the topic at hand, it will be illustrated that inadequate application of the prohibition against double jeopardy necessarily leads to inadequate criminal protection, shortage of just satisfaction for victims and undermining of legal certainty.
References
Bajović, Vanja. 6/2016. Slučaj Milenković - Ne bis in idem u krivičnom i prekršajnom postupku. Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji: 243–258.
Bartsch, Hans-Jürgen. 73:3/2002. Council of Europe ne bis in idem: the European perspective. Revue internationale de droit penal: 1163 - 1171.
Bernard, Diane. 9/2011. Ne bis in idem - Protector of Defendants` Rights or Jurisdictional Pointsman?. Journal of International Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press: 863-880.
Bovan, Saša. 1/2014. Metodski potencijali hermeneutičkog pragmatizma u razumevanju i primeni načela ne bis in idem. Crimen: 62 - 74.
Cassese, Antonio. 2003. International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Coffey, Gerard. 4:1-2/2013. Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis in Idem in conjunction with the Principle of Complementarity. New Journal of European Criminal Law: 59 – 81.
Cvetković, Milunka. 2/2011. Kažnjiva dela i načelo ne bis in idem. Bilten Vrhovnog kasacionog suda.
Delibašić, Tomica. 9/2015. Pitanje razgraničenja i paralelnih postupaka za krivično delo i prekršaj sa aspekta ne bis in idem. Pravni život: 789 - 808.
Explanatory Report to the Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1984. Council of Europe.
Fair Trials Manual. 1998. Amnesty International Publications.
Garačić, A. Grgić, M. 2008. Ne bis in idem (u zakonima, konvencijama i sudskoj praksi). Aktuelna pitanja kaznenog zakonodavstva: 1-32.
Grubač, Momčilo. Vasiljević, Tihomir. 2014. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Projuris.
Guide on Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. 2017b. Council of Europe.
Hanski, Raija. Šajnin, Martin. 2007. Najvažniji slučajevi pred Komitetom za ljudska prava. Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.
Ilić, Goran Majić, Miodrag. Beljanski, Slobodan. Trešnjev, Aleksandar. 2016. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Ilić, Ivan. Veselinović, Jelena. 2016. Tumačenje dejstva načela ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti: 251 – 266.
Ivičević Karas, Elizabeta. Kos, Damir. 19:2/2012. Primjena načela ne bis in idem u hrvatskom kaznenom pravu. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu: 555 - 584.
Janković, Nevena. 4:74/2014. Osnovno pravo javnog tužioca i načelo ne bis in idem. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine: 262-277.
Jokić, Darko. Jokić, Mirela. 1/2016. Application of Ne Bis in Idem Principle in Criminal Procedures and Minor Offence Procedures During Prosecution or Trial For The Same Offence. Tematski zbornik radova od međunarodnog značaja, “Dani Arčibalda Rajsa“ (ur. Dragana Kolarić): 459 - 469.
Lasagni, Giulia, Mirandola Sofia. 2/2019. The European ne bis in idem at the Crossroads of Administrative and Criminal Law. Eucrim: 126 - 135.
Lazarević, Ljubiša. 2006. Komentar Krivičnog zakonika Republike Srbije. Savremena administracija.
Lelieur, Juliette. 9:4/2013. Transnationalising Ne Bis In Idem: How the Rule of Ne Bis in Idem Reveals the Principle of Personal Legal Certainty. Utrecht Law Review: 198 – 210.
Mekbrajd, Džeremi. 2009. Ljudska prava u krivičnom postupku - Praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Savet Evrope.
Mihajlovski, Aleksandar. 1975. Razgraničenje krivičnog dela i prekršaja. Jugoslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo: 205 – 213.
Mrvić-Petrović, Nataša. 2/2014. Poštovanje načela ne bis in idem pri suđenju za slične prekršaje i krivična dela. Žurnal za kriminalistiku i pravo: 27 – 39.
Nenadić, Svetlana. 2014. Načelo ne bis in idem. Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja: 141 – 167.
Novosel, Dragan. Rašo, Marko. Burić, Zoran. 17:2/2010. Razgraničenje kaznenih djela i prekršaja u svjetlu presude Europskog suda za ljudska prava u predmetu Maresti protiv Hrvatske. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu: 785 - 812.
Rid, Karen. 2007. Evropska konvencija o ljudskim pravima - Vodič za praktičare, Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.
Right not to be tried or punished twice (the non bis in idem principle). Factsheet. 2017a. European Court of Human Rights.
Srzentić, Nikola. Stajić, Aleksandar. Lazarević, Ljubiša. 1978. Krivično pravo SFRJ: opšti deo. Savremena administracija.
Trechsel, Stefan. 2005. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford University Press.
Van Den Wyngaert, Christine. Stessens, Guy. 1999. The International Non Bis in Idem Principle: Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48:4. Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law: 779 – 804.
Vasiljević, Tihomir. Grubač, Momčilo. 2005. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku. Justinijan.
Živanović, Toma. 1959. Sistem sintetičke pravne filozofije. Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti.
Zupančič, Boštjan M. 2/2011. Ne bis in idem (Zabrana ponovnog suđenja za isto delo), la belle dame sans merci. Crimen: 171 – 178.
INTERNET STRANICE
http://www.dei.gov.ba/dokumenti/default.aspx?id=4890&langTag=bs-BA, posećena 20.09.2021. godine
https://sdg.humanrights.dk/en/instrument/signees/2469, posećena 22.09.2021. godine
