THE REFLECTION OF WTO BRAZILIAN DISPUTE SETTLEMENTS ON DOMESTIC LAW: A PLACE TO LEGAL PLURALISM?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_19308AKeywords:
WTO, Domestic Law, Legal PluralismAbstract
International trade law, followed by the development of legal mechanisms for regulation of multilateral trading system, from General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade – GATT (1948–94), Uruguay Round (1986–94) to World Trade Organization – WTO (1995) dispute settlement system is the current scenario of the world economy transactions. This paper aims to analyze whether Brazilian activism in the world trading system may be identified in the WTO Dispute Settlement dealing with the concept of direct effect on international law. Since 1995, Brazil has been an assiduous claimant at the WTO and at the South American Common Market (MERCOSUR) dispute mechanism. However, explaining Brazilian participation at the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) requires a collision between the Brazilian private sector and the political relevance that trade disputes have acquired.
References
Barral, W., Project CEPAL/GTZ, GER/06/003, “Towards sustainable and equitable globalization”, Component 3: Improved access to global markets: The Brazilian Experience in Dispute Settlement, ECLAC – Project Documents Collection, United Nations Publication LC/W 147 Brazil 2007.
Bogdandy, A., “Pluralism, direct effect, and the ultimate say: On the relationship between international and domestic constitutional law”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 6, Issue 3–4, 1 Oxford 2008, 397–413.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon015
Capucio, C., “Implementing decisions of the WTO Dispute Settlement in Brazil: is there a place for transparency and participation?” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 59(1), Brazil 2016, 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600108
Griffiths, J. “What is Legal Pluralism?”, Journal of Legal Pluralism 1986, 24 1–55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Schaffer, G. C et al., “Winning at the WTO: the development of a trade policy community within Brazil” (eds. K. Schaffer, G. C. & Melèndez, R.), The Developing Country Experience, Cambridge University Press 2010, 21–104.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663192.003
Status Report Regarding Implementation of the DSB Recommendations and Rulings in the Dispute Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (WT/DS332), https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ cases_e/ds332_e.htm, last visited 10 February 2019.
The dispute DSC 46 CANADA – BRAZIL-AIRCRAFT, https://www.wto.org/ english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/1pagesum_e/ds46sum_e.pdf, last visited 10 February 2019.
The dispute US – Subsidies on Upland Cotton (WT/DS267) (“Cotton”), https://www.wto.org/english/Tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds267_e.htm, last visited 15 February 2019.
Understanding the WTO in: WTO, 20.11.2018, https://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm, last visited 20 February 2019.
