JUDICIAL AGENCY AND LEGAL MEANS IN JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS

Authors

  • Mariam Begadze

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_20403A

Keywords:

Autonomy of Law, Israeli Supreme Court, Judicialization of politics, Judicial agency, Legal Process School

Abstract

Law’s autonomy from politics has been in decline. Theories have been formulated to provide explanations for the development. However, these debates have overlooked the role of judicial agency in the construction of the Court’s own fate. Judicial agency has a lot to determine when courts embark on their mission of embracing political circumstances surrounding them. The present paper argues that insistence on neutral principles by Legal Process School can be guiding for courts to devise judicial techniques that enable warranted appearance of neutrality. Two cases decided by the Israeli Supreme Court will be discussed to elaborate on the argument defended in the paper. In these cases, the Israeli Supreme Court constructs its institutional security by engaging in a principled line of reasoning across its evolving jurisprudence on the same political issue, namely by first exhausting more solid legal arguments and imposing conclusive constitutional resolutions once these less controversial decisions are implemented.

References

Bobbitt, Philip. 2010. Constitutional Law and Interpretation. 132-145. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Dennis M. Patterson. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch7

Carmel, Shalev, Chinitz, David. 2005. Joe Public v. The General Public: The Role of Courts in Israeli Health Care Policy. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33: 650-659

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00533.x

Dixon, Rosalind, Issacharoff, Samuel. 2016. Living to Fight Another Day: Judicial Deferral in Defense of Democracy. Wisconsin Law Review 4: 683-732

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2726045

Duxbury, Neil. 2010. Postrealism and Legal Process. 279-290. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Dennis M. Patterson. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch17

Gargarella, Roberto. 2011. Dialogic justice in the Enforcment of Social Rights: Some Initial Arguments. 232-245. Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health, eds. Alicia Ely Yamin, Siri Gloppen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjz81hc.12

Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189

Gross, Aeyal M. 2013. In Search of the Right to Health in Israeli Constitutional Law in the Making. 311-331. Israeli Constitutional Law in the Making, eds. Gidon Sapir, Daphne Barak-Erez, Aharon Barak. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Gross, Aeyal. 2014. The Right to Health in Israel between Solidarity and Neoliberalism. 159-187. The Rught to Health at the Public/Private Divide: A Global Comparative Study, eds. Colleen Flood, Aeyal Gross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814768.009

Hirschl, Ran. 2007. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Hirschl, Ran. 2008. The Judicialization of Mega-politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 93-118

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906

Kahana, Tsvi. 2013. Majestic Constitutionalism? The Notwithstanding Mechanism in Israel. 73-90. Israeli Constitutional Law in the Making, eds. Gideon Sapir, Daphne Barak-Erez, Aharon Barak. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Liebenberg, Sandra, Young, Katharine. 2015. Adjudicating Social and Economic Rights: Can Democratic Experimentalism Help? 237-257. Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries, eds. Helena Alviar Garcia, Karl Klare, Lucy A. Williams. London: Routledge

Lustig, Doreen, Weiler, J. H. H. 2018. Judicial Review in the Contemporary World – Retrospective and Prospective. International Journal of Constitutional Law 16: 315-372

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy057

Navot, Suzie. 2014. The Constitution of Israel: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Pillay, Anashri. 2014. Revisiting the Indian Experience of Economic and Social Rights Adjudication: The Need for a Principled Approach to Judicial Activism and Restraint. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 63: 385-408

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000074

Rosenfeld, Michael. 2019. Judicial Politics versus Ordinary Politics: Is the Constitutional Judge Caught in the Middle. 36-65. Judicial Power, ed. Christine Landfried. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669.003

Roux, Theunis. 2009. Principle and Pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7: 106-138

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon029

Roux, Theunis. 2018. The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108340977

Roux, Theunis. 2018. Losing Faith in Law’s Autonomy: a Comparative Analysis. 204-225. Comparative Judicial Review, eds. Erin F. Delaney, Rosalind Dixon. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, US: Edward Elgar Publishing

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110600.00019

Sabel, Charles F., Simon, William H. 2004. Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds. Harvard Law Review 117: 1015-1101

https://doi.org/10.2307/4093364

Sunstein, Cass R. 2007. Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law. Social Research 74: 1-24

Tushnet, Mark. 2003. New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights and Democracy – Based Worries. Wake Forest Law Review 38: 813-838

Versteeg, Mila. 2019. Understanding the Third Wave of Judicial Review: Afterword to the Foreword by Doreen Lustig and J. H. H. Weiler. International Journal of Constitutional Law 17: 10-16

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz026

Volcansek, Mary L. 2019. Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Courts in New Democracies. 66-81. Judicial Power, ed. Christine Landfried. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348669.004

Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 73: 1-35

https://doi.org/10.2307/1337945

Weintal, Sharon. 2013. Unenumerated Constitutional Rights in Israel. 285-302. Israeli Constitutional Law in the Making, eds. Gideon Sapir, Daphne Barak-Erez, Aharon Barak. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Young, Katharine, Lemaitre, Julieta. 2013. Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa. Harvard Human Rights Journal 26: 179-216

Zreik, Raef. 2019. Ronald Dworkin and Duncan Kennedy: Two Views of Interpretation. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 32: 195-234

https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2019.9

Downloads

Published

27.04.2021

Issue

Section

Articles