This is an outdated version published on 29.03.2026. Read the most recent version.

International Human Rights in a World of Swings: Navigating Whataboutism, Wokeness, and “Modern Slavery”

Authors

  • Tibor Varadi Member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_25201A

Keywords:

International law, Human Rights, Woke, Whataboutism, Modern Slavery

Abstract

Establishing a better reality is a crucial goal of international law. An important part of the task is a true understanding of realities. Human rights are properly expressed in international treaties, yet we are also in cohabitation with a permanent danger and a lasting trend to perceive human rights principles as phrases, and to divorce them from realities. Patterns of slogan-oriented thinking, born in ideologies, may survive the ideology itself. Positive inspirations might also turn into a swing detached from realities. There are strong trends aiming to push truly important topics (like affirmative action, the woke movement, or modern slavery) to one or other side of ideological controversy.

Threats to human rights are changing, and solutions can only be crafted after rightful confrontation with present threats. It is critically important to create a true perception of human rights, including rights of minorities and rights of socially unequal people. The phenomenon of modern slavery that has gained some ground must not be disregarded. Attempts towards protection of human rights can only function if our efforts are focusing on present menaces.

References

al-Gharbi, Musa. 2024. We Have Never Been Woke – The Cultural Contradictions of a New Elite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Buergenthal, Thomas, Dinah Shelton, David Stewart. 2002. International Human Rights in a Nutshell. Eagan: West Group.

Cryer, Robert. 2005. Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D’Amato, Anthony. 1994. Is International Law „Law”? 37. In International Law Anthology (ed. D’Amato, Anthony). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company.

Fariss, Christopher. 2018. The Changing Standard of Accountability and the Positive Relationship between Human Rights Treaty Ratification and Compliance. British Journal of Political Science, 239-271.

Friedman, Jonathan. 2022. Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Censor Books in Schools. https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/ (last visited February 25, 2026)

Green, Leon. 1928. The Duty Problem in Negligence Cases, Columbia Law Review, 1014 – 1017.

Henkin, Louis. 1989. International Law: Politics, Values and Functions. Recueil des cours, 18.

Holmes, Stephen. 2007. The Matador’s Cape – America’s Reckless Response to Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaleck, Wolfgang. 2015. Double Standards: International Criminal Law and the West. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic Epublisher.

Koh, Steve A. 2023. Prosecution and Polarization. Fordham Urban Law Journal 1117-1137.

Lieblich, Eliav. 2024. Whataboutism in International Law. Harvard International Law Review, 343-386.

Nanda, Ved P. 1990. The Validity of the United States Intervention in Panama Under International Law. American Journal of International Law, 494-503.

Posner, Richard. 2009. Law and Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Quigley, John. 2007. Soviet Legal Innovation and the Law of the Western World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raleigh, Helen. 2022. Judge To Yale: You Use Cancel Culture, So I Won’t Hire Your Grads. https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/05/federal-judge-sticks-it-to-yale-law-if-youre-a-cancel-culture-cesspool-i-wont-hire-your-grads/ (last visited February 25, 2026)

Simmons, Frances, Jennifer Burn, Fiona McLeod. 2022. Modern Slavery and Material Justice: The Case for Remedy and Reparation,.UNSW Law Journal, 148-183.

Speri, Alice. 2021. How the U.S. derailed an effort to prosecute its crimes in Afghanistan. Intercept, 5 October.

Titus, Ron. 2022. Banned Books 2022 – The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. https://www.marshall.edu/library/bannedbooks/the-adventures-of-huckleberry-finn/ (last visited February 25, 2026)

Várady, Tibor. 2013. Ambiguous Choices in the Trials of Milošević’s Serbia. 459-464. In The Milošević Trial – An Autopsy (ed. Timothy William Waters). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Várady, Tibor, Miodrag Jovanović (eds.). 2020. Human Rights in the 21st Century. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Várady, Tibor. 2021. People in Spite of History. Budapest-New York: Central European University Press.

Downloads

Published

29.03.2026

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles