Evidential significance of information from communications obtained by encryption application/modified devices: Such as Sky ECC and EnchroChat

Authors

  • Milan Škulić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Serbia and Constitutional Court, Beograde

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2401003S

Keywords:

evidence; encrypted communication; Sky ECC; criminal procedure; comparative law; European Court of Human Rights; EU Court of Justice

Abstract

In the article is presented one view of information and potential evidence from communication, obtained using special devices and applications for encryption of communication. In particular, the phenomenon of the Sky ECC application is explained, which is not only the most commented on in the media, but is current in a whole series of current criminal proceedings, especially in the sphere of organized crime, both in Serbia and throughout Europe, but also in the world in general. After analysing the basic evidentiary rules in the positive criminal procedural legislation of Serbia, which in principle could be important when it comes to the evaluation of the evidentiary credibility of information derived from communication made with special applications for encryption of conversations, in the article are explained relevant examples from the comparative judicial practice of a number of European countries. Very current cases of this type that were resolved in Serbia were also explained. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights, which concerns the possible violation of the right to privacy due to the interception of communications made with special applications, was also analysed. Special attention was given to the opinion of the General advocate who acts before the Court of Justice of the European Union in relation to a series of questions that the Regional Court in Berlin put to that court, which concern the information resulting from the application of the European investigative warrant, which was previously obtained in France by a special operativetactical ways to collect data from communications encrypted by the EnchroChat application. In conclusion, it is emphasized that there is no miracle recipe that will absolutely solve all evidentiary problems that arise or may arise when dealing with information from communications made with special applications for encryption of conversations. The time in which the future judicial practice will be implemented (the basic contours of which can already be seen relatively clearly), and above all the positions of the highest courts of specific countries, including the positions of the Serbian courts, will show the real importance and the degree of relevance of a number of factors, which could in principle have an impact on the evidentiary credibility of such information/evidence. Of course, such judicial practice, as usual, the practice of courts in the legal environment of the rule of law, must arise in legally and fairly conducted criminal procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleksić, Ž., and M. Škulić. 2020. Kriminalistika, 11. izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.

Ambos, K. 2018. Internationales Strafrecht – Strafanwendugsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, Rechtshilfe, 5. Auflage. München. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406746697

Bajović, V. 2022. "EncroChat i Sky ECC komunikacija kao dokaz u krivičnom postupku." Crimen 2.

Beulke, W. 2000. Strafprozessrecht. Heidelberg.

Beulke, W., and S. Swoboda. 2020. Strafprozessrecht, 15. Neu bearbeitete Auflage. Heidelberg.

Brodag, W. D. 2001. Kriminalistik – Grundlagen der Verbrechensbekämpfung. Stuttgart, München.

Vasiljević, T. 1981. Sistem krivičnog procesnog prava SFRJ, 3. izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.

Damaška, M. 1960. "Procesne posledice upotrebe dokaza dobivenih na nedozvoljen način." Naša zakonitost 3–6.

Diehl, J., R. Lehberger, and C. Meyer-Heuer. 2023. "Landgericht Berlin lässt Encrochat-Daten nicht zu." Der Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/justiz/berlin-landgericht-laesst-encrochat-daten-nicht-zu-a-6dd9be2e-f558–40fa-9995–2f8136581f8e.

Fletcher, M., R. Lööf, and B. Gilmore. 2008. Eu Criminal Law and Justice. Cheltenham, Northampton. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848443884

Goodwin, B. 2024. "French Supreme Court Dismisses Legal Challenge to EncroChat Cryptophone Evidence." Computer Weekly. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366551078/French-supreme-court-dismisses-legal-challenge-to-EncroChat-cryptophone-evidence.

Goodwin, B. 2024. "Italian Supreme Court Calls for Prosecutors to Disclose Information on Sky ECC Hacking Operation." Computer Weekly. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252525734/Italian-Supreme-Court-calls-for-prosecutors-to-disclose-information-on-Sky-ECC-hacking-operation.

Grubač, M. 2002. Krivično procesno pravo – Uvod i opšti deo, 2. izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.

Grupa autora. 2023. Izdvajanje nezakonito pribavljenih dokaza u krivičnom postupku – principi iz prakse Evropskog suda za ljudska prava i sudska praksa u Crnoj Gori, ed. T. Gorjanc Prelević. Podgorica.

Gutkes, O. 2012. "Digital Evidence in Criminal Law." https://www.ecba.org/extdocserv/conferences/tallinn2012/recdev_france.pdf.

Kaiser, S. 1999. Die Drei-Stufen-Theorie zur Bestimmung von Beweisverboten im Strafprozeß? Frankfurt, Berlin.

Marković, B. 1937. Udžbenik sudskog krivičnog postupka Kraljevine Jugoslavije. Beograd.

Miljuš, I. 2022. "Načelo jednakosti 'oružja' u krivičnom postupku." Beograd.

Oerlemans, J. J., and D. A. G. van Toor. 2022. "Legal Aspects of the EncroChat Operation: A Human Rights Perspective." European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 30. https://brill.com/view/journals/eccl/30/3–4/article-p309_006.xml?language=en. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-bja10037

Roxin, C. 1998. Strafverfahrensrecht, 25. Auflage. München.

Roxin, C., and B. Schüneman. 2017. Strafverfahrensrecht, 29. Auflage. München.

Satzger, H. 2018. Internationales und Europäisches Strafrecht – Strafanwendugsrecht, Europäisches Straf– und Strafverfahrensrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, 8. Auflage. Baden, Baden. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845281933

Schaefer, K. 1976. Strafprozessrecht – Eine Einführung. Berlin, New York.

Scheb, J. M. 1999. Criminal Law and Procedure. Belmont, Bonn, Boston, Washington.

Stojanović, Z. 2018. Međunarodno krivično pravo, 12. izdanje. Beograd.

Stojanović, Z., M. Škulić, and V. Delibašić. 2018. Osnovi krivičnog prava, Knjiga II – Krivično procesno pravo – Krivični postupak kroz praktičnu primenu. Beograd.

Čavoški, K. 2017. O pravdi i pravičnosti. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2009. Komentar Zakonika o krivičnom postupku Crne Gore. Podgorica.

Škulić, M. 2012. Krivično procesno pravo. Podgorica.

Škulić, M. 2012. "Začeci evropskog krivičnog procesnog prava." In Zbornik škole prava Evropske unije, III sesija. Podgorica.

Škulić, M. 2022. Krivično procesno pravo, 13. izdanje. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2022. Međunarodno krivično pravo – prostorno važenje krivičnog prava, krivično pravo međunarodnog porekla, međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć, začeci krivičnog prava EU. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2022. Kriminalistika. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2022. Međunarodno krivično pravo. Beograd.

Škulić, M. 2023. Osnovi krivičnog prava Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, 2. izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd.

Škulić, M., and T. Bugarski. 2015. Krivično procesno pravo. Novi Sad.

Ulsamer, G. 1996. Lexikon des Rechts – Strafrecht – Strafverfahrensrecht, 2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage.

Wahl, T. 2023. "EncroChat Turns into a Case for the CJEU." https://eucrim.eu/news/encrochat-turns-into-a-case-for-the-cjeu/.

Walder, H. 1965. Die Vernehmung des Beschuldigten. Hamburg.

Downloads

Published

24.05.2024

How to Cite

Škulić, Milan. 2024. “Evidential Significance of Information from Communications Obtained by Encryption Application Modified Devices: Such As Sky ECC and EnchroChat”. Crimen 15 (1):3-55. https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2401003S.

Issue

Section

Articles