JUDICIAL AVENUES FOR UPHOLDING THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW: THE DOWNING OF MH17 CASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_21101AKeywords:
ECtHR, ICJ, MH17, State responsibility, UkraineAbstract
The article seeks to identify the means in which key principles of the international rule of law are applied in practice. It postulates that the plurality of available legal remedies fosters the international rule of law development. The article evaluates the ongoing and potential legal proceedings against States in relation to the 2014 downing of flight MH17 and their interplay. With the exception of the individual and the Dutch inter-State application, three international bodies are currently tackling the dispute from a perspective wider than the MH17 incident – namely, the situation in Eastern Ukraine (and Crimea). The objective of this article is to showcase the different efforts to bring justice by ramifying the MH17 case within them. The article chiefly focuses on the ongoing proceedings seeking State responsibility – the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
References
BBC. 2014. MH17 crash: Airlines divert flights from eastern Ukraine. //www.bbc.com/news/business-28356745 (last visited 4 November 2020).
Chestermann, Simon. 2007. Rule of Law. in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford Public International Law.
Chimni, S. Bhupinder. 2012. Legitimating the rule of law. 290–308 in The Cambridge Companion to International Law, edited by James Crawford and Martti Koskenniemi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, James. 2002. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility – Introduction, Text and Commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, James. 2013a. Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law. The Hague: Pocketbooks of the Hague Academy of International Law.
Crawford, James. 2013b. State responsibility – The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, James, Kenne, Amelia. 7/2020. Interpretation of the human rights treaties by the International Court of Justice. The International Journal of Human Rights. 24: 935–956.
De Hoon, Marieke, Julie Fraser, Brianne McGonigle Leyh. 2016. Legal Remedies for Downing Flight MH17. White Paper. Public International Law & Policy Group and VU University Amsterdam. https://www.vu.nl/nl/ Images/Legal_Remedies_for_Downing_Flight_MH17_tcm289–747125.pdf (last visited 14 November 2020).
De Hoon, Marieke. 84/2017. Navigating the Legal Horizon: Lawyering the MH17 Disaster. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 33: 90–119.
DW. 2020. Australia, Netherlands slam Russia’s withdrawal from MH17 talks. https://www.dw.com/en/australia-netherlands-slam-russias-withdrawal-from-mh17-talks/a-55293316 (last visited 7 November 2020).
ECtHR. 2018a. ECHR to adjourn some individual applications on Eastern Ukraine pending Grand Chamber judgment in related inter-State case. Press Release.
ECtHR. 2018b. Extra-territorial jurisdiction of States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights. Fact Sheet. 13. ECtHR. 2018c. Grand Chamber to examine four complaints by Ukraine against Russia over Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. Press Release.
ECtHR. 2019. ECHR gives notification to Russia of cases brought by relatives of people killed in the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH-17. Press Release.
ECtHR. 2020a. New inter-State application brought by the Netherlands against Russia concerning downing of Malaysia Airlines fight MH17. Press Release.
ECtHR. 2020b. Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria. §88. (last visited 12 November 2020).
Forowicz, Magdalena. 2015. Factors influencing the reception of international law in the ECtHR’s case law: an overview. 191–217 in A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law, edited by Mads Andenas and Eirik Bjorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garciandia, Rosana. 2020. State responsibility and positive obligations in the European Court of Human Rights: The contribution of the ICJ in advancing towards more judicial integration. Leiden Journal of International Law 33: 177–187.
Gibney, Mark. 1/2015. The Downing of MH17: Russian Responsibility? Human Rights Law Review 15: 169–178.
Government of the Netherlands. 2020. The Netherlands brings MH17 case against Russia before European Court of Human Rights. https://www. government.nl/latest/news/2020/07/10/the-netherlands-brings-mh17-caseagainst-russia-before-european-court-of-human-rights (last visited 12 November 2020).
Greenwood, Christopher. 2015. Unity and Diversity in International Law. 37–55 in A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law, edited by Mads Andenas and Eirik Bjorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heller, Kevin Jon. 2014. MH17 Should Be Framed as Murder, Not as a War Crime. Opinio Juris. https://opiniojuris.org/2014/08/11/mh-17-framedmurder-war-crime/ (last visited 13 November 2020).
Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence. 2019. International Litigation and the Disaggregation of Disputes: Ukraine/Russia as a Case Study. ICLQ. 68: 779–815. 24. ICC. 2018. Report on Preliminary Examination Activities. §§59–62. https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocuments/181205-rep-otp-PE-ENG.pdf (last visited 7 November 2020).
ILC. 2006. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, 58th Session, A/ CN.4/L.682. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf (last visited 12 November 2020).
Katselli Proukaki, Elena. 2010. The Problem of Enforcement in International Law – Countermeasures, the non-injured state and the idea of international community. London: Routledge Research in International Law.
Kontogiannis, Dimitris. 2019. Provisional Measures in Ukraine v. Russia: From Illusions to Reality or a Prejudgment in Disguise? EJIL:Talk! https:// www.ejiltalk.org/provisional-measures-in-ukraine-v-russia-from-illusionsto-reality-or-a-prejudgment-in-disguise/ (last visited 10 November 2020).
Koskenniemi, Martti, Päivi Leino. 3/2002. Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law 15: 553–579.
Marchuk, Iryna. 2019. Green Light from the ICJ to Go Ahead with Ukraine’s Dispute against the Russian Federation Involving Allegations of Racial Discrimination and Terrorism Financing. EJIL:Talk! https://www. ejiltalk.org/green-light-from-the-icj-to-go-ahead-with-ukraines-disputeagainst-the-russian-federation-involving-allegations-of-racial-discrimination-and-terrorism-financing/ (last visited 6 November 2020).
Matta, Aaron. 2015a. Guest Post: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 – Possible Legal Avenues for Redress (Part 1). Opinio Juris. https://opiniojuris. org/2015/08/27/guest-post-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh17-possible-legalavenues-for-redress-part-1/ (last visited 13 November 2020).
Matta, Aaron. 2015b. Guest Post: Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 – Possible Legal Avenues for Redress (Part 2). Opinio Juris. https://opiniojuris. org/2015/08/28/guest-post-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh17-possible-legalavenues-for-redress-part-2/ (last visited 14 November 2020).
Matta, Aaron. 2017. MH17 Downing Suspects to be Prosecuted Before Dutch Domestic Courts – An Obstacle or an Advantage for International Justice? Opinio Juris. https://opiniojuris.org/2017/07/17/33212/ (last visited 12 November 2020).
Milanović, Marko. 2014. The Downing of MH17 and the Potential Involvement of International Courts. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/thedowning-of-mh17-and-the-potential-involvement-of-international-courts/ (last visited 14 November 2020).
Milanović, Marko. 2018. The Applicability of the ECHR in Contested Territories; Two Other ECHR Cases Against Russia. EJIL:Talk! https://www. ejiltalk.org/the-applicability-of-the-echr-in-contested-territories-two-otherechr-cases-against-russia/ (last visited 9 November 2020).
Milanović, Marko. 2019. Russian Agents Charged with Downing of MH17; MH17 Cases in Strasbourg. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/ russian-agents-charged-with-downing-of-mh17-mh17-cases-in-strasbourg/ (last visited 28 October 2020).
Milanović, Marko. 2021. ECtHR Grand Chamber Declares Admissible the Case of Ukraine v. Russia re Crimea. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/ ecthr-grand-chamber-declares-admissible-the-case-of-ukraine-v-russia-recrimea/ (last visited 14 February 2021).
Milanović, Marko, Sangeeta Shah. 2021. Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia (nos 8019/16, 43800/14 and 28525/20), Amicus Curiae Brief. SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3775402 (last visited 8 February 2021).
Motoc, Iulia, Johann Justus Vasel. 2018. The ECHR and Responsibility of the State: Moving Towards Judicial Integration: A View from the Bench.199–212 in The European Convention on Human Rights and General International Law, edited by Anne van Aaken and Iulia Motoc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Netherlands Public Prosecution Office. MH17 – Prosecution and trial. https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/topics/mh17-plane-crash/prosecutionand-trial (last visited 9 February 2021).
Ohlin, Jens David. 2014. Control Matters: Ukraine & Russia and the Downing of Flight MH17. Opinio Juris. http://opiniojuris.org/2014/07/23/controlmatters-ukraine-russia-downing-flight-17/ (last visited 28 October 2020).
Peters, Anne. 2017. “Vulnerability” versus “Plausibility”: Righting or Wrongi ng the Regime of Provisional Measures? Reflections on ICJ, Ukraine v. Russian Federation, Order of 19 April 2017. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/vulnerability-versus-plausibility-righting-or-wronging-the-regime-ofprovisional-measures-reflections-on-icj-ukraine-v-russian-federation-order-of-19-apr/ (last visited 2 November 2020).
Pillai, Priya. 2019. Accountability for Flight MH17: A Long and Winding Road. Opinio Juris. https://opiniojuris.org/2019/06/20/accountability-forflight-mh17-a-long-and-winding-road/ (last visited 15 November 2020).
Proulx, Vincent-Joel. 2017. ‘Terrorism’ at the World Court: Ukraine v Russia as an Opportunity for Greater Guidance on Relevant Obligations? EJIL:Talk! -guidance-on-relevant-obligations/ (last visited 14 November 2020).
Pusztai, David. 2014. MH17 Goes to Strasbourg: Some Remarks on Obligations of Prevention, Foreseeability and Causation. EJIL:Talk! https:// www.ejiltalk.org/mh-17-goes-to-strasbourg-some-remarks-on-obligations-ofprevention-foreseeability-and-causation/ (last visited 12 November 2020).
Risini, Isabella, Geir Ulfstein. 2020. The Netherlands’ inter-State application against Russia six years after MH17. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk. org/the-netherlands-inter-state-application-against-russia-six-years-aftermh-17/ (last visited 23 September 2020).
Risini, Isabella. 2018. The Inter-State Application under the European Convention on Human Rights – Between Collective Enforcement of Human Rights and International Dispute Settlement. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Spielmann, Dean. 2015. Fragmentation or Partnership? The Reception of ICJ Case-law by the European Court of Human Rights. 173–190 in A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law, edited by Mads Andenas and Eirik Bjorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Guardian. 2014. Many airlines have avoided Ukrainian airspace for months. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/18/airlines-avoidukraine-airspace-mh17 (last visited 4 November 2020).
The Guardian. 2018. MH17: Australia and Netherlands accuse Russia of complicity. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/25/mh17-australia-and-netherlands-accuse-russia-of-complicity (last visited 14 November 2020).
The Netherlands Public Prosecution Service. The criminal investigation by the Joint Investigative Team (JIT). https://www.prosecutionservice.nl/ topics/mh17-plane-crash/criminal-investigation-jit-mh17 (last visited 12 November 2020).
Trapp, Kimberley. 2017. Ukraine v Russia (Provisional Measures): State ‘Terrorism’ and IHL. EJIL:Talk! https://www.ejiltalk.org/ukraine-v-russiaprovisional-measures-state-terrorism-and-ihl/ (last visited 4 November 2020).
Ulfstein, Geir, Isabella Risini. 2020. Inter-State Applications under the European Convention on Human Rights: Strengths and Challenges. EJIL:Talk! (last visited 28 October 2020).
UN. 2015. Security Council Fails to Adopt Resolution on Tribunal for Malaysia Airlines Crash in Ukraine, Amid Calls for Accountability, Justice for Victims. UN Security Council 7498th Meeting, SC/11990. https://www. un.org/press/en/2015/sc11990.doc.htm (last visited 5 November 2020).
UN. 2019. Report of the International Court of Justice 2018/19. United Nations General Assembly. Official Records, Seventy-fourth Session, Supplement No. 4. New York 2019. §190. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/ annual-reports/2018–2019-en.pdf (last visited 25 October 2020).
UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Killings. 2021. Statement: Commercial Airlines and Conflict Zones: Recommendations to strengthen air safety and prevent unlawful deaths. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Executions/StatementCommercialAirlinesConflictZones_Jan2021.pdf (last visited 6 February 2021).
Whiting, Alex. 2014. How to Prosecute the Perpetrators of the Malaysian Jet Downing. Just Security. https://www.justsecurity.org/13269/prosecuteperpetrators-malaysian-jet-downing/ (last visited 28 October 2020).
Yanev, Lachezar. 2020. The Dutch Prosecution’s Opening Statement in the MH-17 Trial: What Lies Beyond the Horizon? EJIL:Talk! https://www. ejiltalk.org/the-dutch-prosecutions-opening-statement-in-the-mh-17-trial-what-lies-beyond-the-horizon/ (last visited 6 November 2020).
