The universality principle of applicability of criminal legislation

The comparative analyses

Authors

  • Zoran Stojanović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Serbia

Keywords:

universal principle; territorial validity of the criminal law; international criminal offence; subsidiarity of the application of domestic law

Abstract

Universal principle of the territorial validity of the criminal law is commonly accepted in the legislation of the European countries. There are certain differences regarding the conditions and reaches of the application of this principle. While there are some countries that don't have any additional conditions for application of domestic law with regards to certain criminal offences and cases in which a foreign citizen commits a crime abroad to the detriment of citizens of another country or a foreign country itself, more or less all the European countries allow, under certain conditions, application of domestic law in this case as well. There are differences regarding the limitation of validity of the universal principle, but in most cases legislation of other countries have the two limitations which are also present in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia. These are the condition that the foreign citizen was in the state at the time (forum deprehensionis) and the principle of subsidiarity, i.e. that the domestic law will be applied only if legislation of another country wasn't applied already. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia takes a standard and common solution in this matter. The Law on Organisation and Jurisdiction of Government Authorities in Prosecuting Perpetrators of War Crimes does not mean derogation of the regulations of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, i.e. it is not able to regulate an issue that concerns substantive law. It is a legislation which regulates certain organisational matters and, partially, procedural law matters, as the name suggests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambos, Kai. 2008. Internationales Strafrecht, 2nd ed. München

Beken, Tom V., Geert Vermeulen, and Tom Ongena. 2002. "Concurrent National and International Criminal Jurisdiction and the Principle ‘Ne Bis in Idem’." Revue internationale de droit pénal 73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.733.0811

Cassese, Antonio. 2003. International Criminal Law. Oxford

Fabrizy, E.E. 2002. Strafgesetzbuch, Kurzkommentar, 8th ed. Wien

Fernandez, Alija R. A. 2014. "The Reform of Universal Jurisdiction in Spain, From All to Nothing." ZIS 13

Frister, H. 2015. Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, 7th ed. München

Garofoli, R. 2009. Manuale di diritto penale. Roma

Hecker, B. 2010. Europäisches Strafrecht, 3rd ed. Berlin-Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13127-1_1

Jescheck, H.-H., and Thomas Weigend. 1996. Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, AT, 5th ed. Berlin

Lackner, Klaus, and Karl Kühl. 2011. Strafgesetzbuch, Kommentar, 27th ed. München

Pavlović, Š. 2015. Kazneni zakon, 3rd ed. Rijeka

Reydams, Luc. 2010. The Rise and Fall of Universal Jurisdiction. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Downloads

Published

21.12.2016

How to Cite

Stojanović, Zoran. 2016. “The Universality Principle of Applicability of Criminal Legislation: The Comparative Analyses”. Crimen 7 (3):21-38. https://epub.ius.bg.ac.rs/index.php/crimenjournal/article/view/455.