About certain dilemmas concerning criminal protection against money laundering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen1902122VKeywords:
money laundering; property contamination; unpunishable subsequent crime; defense attorneyAbstract
Despite several works devoted in recent years to the criminal offense of money laundering, certain issues of the boundaries of its criminal zone continue to intrigue. In addition to reminding of the most important points of dispute, the author particularly considers the subjective side of this crime and especially its form that implies that money laundering can be done with the property that the perpetrator himself has acquired through previous criminal activity. Special attention is also paid to the issue of possible conflicts of interest of the defense attorney, in case there is a suspicion that the received fee comes from the criminal activity of the defendant.
Downloads
References
Ambos, K. 2002. "Annahme ‘bemakelten’ Verteidigershonorars als Geldwäsche?" Juristenzeitung, no. 2.
Bermejo, M. G., and Wirtz, G. 2007. "Strafverteidigerhonorar und Geldwäsche aus Europäischer Perspektive: Gleiches Problem, Gleiche Lösung?" Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, no. 10.
Delić, N. 2006. "Krivično Delo Pranja Novca – Međunarodni Okviri i Pozitivnopravna Regulativa." In Primena Međunarodnog Krivičnog Prava od Strane Međunarodnih i Domaćih Sudova, Tara.
Đorđević, M. 2018. Oduzimanje Imovine Učiniocima Krivičnih Dela. Doctoral dissertation, Pravni Fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Đorđević, M. 2016. "Pranje Novca u Srpskom Krivičnom Pravu." Crimen, no. 2.
Grubač, M., and Vasiljević, T. 2014. Komentar Zakonika o Krivičnom Postupku. Beograd.
Höpfel, F., and Ratz, E. 2011. Wiener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch: §§ 156–156a. Wien.
Joecks, W., and Miebach, K., eds. 2017. Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch. München.
Kindhaüser, U., Neumann, U., and Paeffgen, H.-U., eds. 2017. Nomos-Kommentar: Strafgesetzbuch. Baden-Baden.
Kühl, K., and Heger, M. 2018. Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar. München.
Lazarević, Lj. 2011. Komentar Krivičnog Zakonika. Beograd.
Lukić, N. 2014. Suzbijanje Organizovanog Kriminaliteta: Komparativni Pristup. Beograd.
Morris, D. M. 1986. "Attorney Fee Forfeiture." Columbia Law Review, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122549
Niggli, M. A., and Wiprächtiger, H., eds. 2007. Strafrecht II: Basler Kommentar. Basel.
Roxin, C. 2003. Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Band II: Besondere Erscheinungsformen der Straftat. München.
Schönke, A., and Schröder, H. 2019. Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar. München.
Srzentić, N., ed. 1986. Komentar Krivičnih Zakona SR Srbije, SAP Kosova i SAP Vojvodine. Beograd.
Stojanović, Z. 2018. Komentar Krivičnog Zakonika. Beograd.
Stojanović, Z., and Delić, N. 2018. Krivično Pravo: Posebni Deo. Beograd.
Tahović, J. Đ. 1957. Komentar Krivičnog Zakonika. Beograd.
Vuković, I. 2016. "Oduzimanje Imovine Proistekle iz Krivičnog Dela – Evropski Okvir i Srpsko Zakonodavstvo." Crimen, no. 1.
Zlatarić, B. 1956. Krivični Zakonik u Praktičnoj Primjeni: Opći Deo. Zagreb.
Zlatarić, B. 1958. Krivični Zakonik u Praktičnoj Primjeni: II Svezak. Zagreb.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Igor Vuković
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, allowing others to share the work with proper attribution to the authors and acknowledgment of its original publication in this journal.
